Incandescent light bulbs are officially banned in the U.S.::America’s ban on incandescent light bulbs, 16 years in the making, is finally a reality. Well, mostly.

  • tired_n_bored
    link
    English
    71 year ago

    Why are Republicans mad about it?!

    • ArxCyberwolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 year ago

      Because they’re driven entirely by emotion, not rationality. They were told to be angry about it, so they are. Plus, Biden or something.

    • Hextic
      link
      English
      141 year ago

      When are they aren’t mad? LOL they can die mad for all I care.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Something about limiting consumer choice, but everyone purchased LED bulbs to begin with anyways…

      • @Techmaster
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        I bet they were equally pissed off when Kmart went out of business.

    • @2ez
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      Tradition

    • m3t00🌎
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      because they think we should be burning whale oil

    • @beigegull
      link
      English
      01 year ago

      Because imagining that someone might have a legitimate reason to want a product or service that a regulator might not have thought of is currently a “Republican” trait in the US.

      • tired_n_bored
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Does anybody use incandescent light bulbs as radiators? Because it’s the only alternative use I can think of.

        In the European Union we banned them 10 years ago and people just continued their lives. I wish people were as mad when books get banned, but sadly it’s not the case

        • @beigegull
          link
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Does anybody use incandescent light bulbs as radiators?

          Yes. I’ve done it personally a couple times.

          Because it’s the only alternative use I can think of.

          The thing about alternative uses is that they’re still real even if you can’t think of them.

          Broad bans are a bad policy tool in general. Even if you believe in the progressive ideal of expert regulators making broad societal policies, a simple thought experiment shows the problem: What would it take to do the study to accurately determine all the negative effects of a ban? Not guessing, not wishful thinking, but really collecting and analyzing the information.

          I wish people were as mad when books get banned, but sadly it’s not the case

          When was the last time the US federal government banned a book?

            • tired_n_bored
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              The link seems broken even if I copy-paste it? Wtf. It’s a Wikipedia article titled " 2021–2023 book banning in the United States"

            • @beigegull
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Once you’re doing resistive heating any resistive element is just as efficient as any other. Incandescent light bulbs have three advantages: They are cheap, easy to work with, and it’s really obvious when one is turned on.

              As for your link, it’s talking about arguments about which books should be made available at school and local libraries. In no sense is that even related to the federal government banning books.

              • tired_n_bored
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                Well I’ve never said the US federal government is banning books, but I wish people were as mad when their local schools and libraries do that :-)

      • @WindInTrees
        link
        English
        -11 year ago

        And what is that legitimate reason here?