Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan warned that the Supreme Court’s decision in the Texas redistricting case will lead to a “violation of the Constitution” of voter rights.
The Supreme Court issued an unsigned decision in favor of freezing the initial 2-1 U.S. federal court ruling against Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s proposed redistricting map, a stay that could help Republicans pick up five additional U.S. House seats in next year’s midterms.
“This Court’s stay ensures that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race,” Kagan wrote in her dissent. “And that result, as this Court has pronounced year in and year out, is a violation of the Constitution.”
Oh yeah just better hand it over for the next 50 years when no one else cares about their names or blames them if they do. This is peak lemmy.
My point isn’t that they should be concerned about their reputations. Rather, that by staying on the court, they’re lending the legitimacy of their names and reputations to an illegitimate court—thereby helping prop up an authoritarian regime. The sooner people broadly agree that the court is illegitimate, the sooner its power to support the regime crumbles.
No they aren’t lending legitimacy, and no they are not helping prop up, and no its power won’t crumble. And no, they will think about the big picture rather than throwing a tantrum and quitting which won’t accomplish anything. Scratch that, not only will it not accomptlish anything, quitting will set back the country another 50 years. The intelligent thing to do is to stay, for alllll the reasons I have already outlined. I’m just repeating myself and you are not absorbing anything so I’m out.
Bye!