There is no need to have a community dedicated to every female celebrity that exists; we already have the c/celebnsfw and c/celebs communities, and in pretty much all of your communities, you are the only poster.

@Madness

  • @WhoRoger
    link
    English
    91 year ago

    I have blocked hundreds of communities of sports teams, cities all around the world (especially US), and when it comes to nsfw, also dozens of furry, gay, fat, trans and other comms I don’t care about, while I do sub to a bunch of celeb subs.

    People want different things. You can watch only your subscribe feed and see only what you want to see, or you can go on a path of discovery and whine about it block what you’re not interested in.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -41 year ago

      It has nothing to do with which feed to watch. Especially with a (comparatively) small instance like lemmynsfw.com. One poster on a single community can dominate the Hot feed for an entire day. The problem is when it’s one user, making a hundred communities, where they only post a handful of images, and they’re the only person contributing, it becomes whack-a-mole with blocking the communities and also you have to wonder if that content wouldn’t be better spent concentrated in communities which can sustain more than say 10 images.

      There’s nothing wrong with the content. But that’s what the celebrity, celebrity NSFW and porn star subs are for (which he also moderates??). Spreading it out like this just hyper concentrates power to one dude and makes vastly more work for both people who want to see that content (more subs to subscribe to) and people who don’t (more subs to block). He currently moderates 109 communities and swears he’s been deleting the inactive ones.