• TheTechnician27
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 天前

    You don’t have to pay more than the 45 € beginner pack

    That’s an absolutely obscene ask for an eight-year-old game with no prospects of being finished in the foreseeable future – let alone that it has macrotransactions for things like paints and intentionally puts you at a disadvantage to players who paid hundreds of euros for this stupid piece of shit grift.

    • cole@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 天前

      nah it’s not pay to win. it’s not hard to earn in-game money and buy ships with that

      • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 天前

        it’s not hard to earn in-game money and buy ships with that

        If you can skip that process by paying real money, and the things you unlock are gameplay-effecting upgrades, then that’s pay-to-win. That’s what the phrase originally meant before being diluted. Non pay-to-win microtransactions are purely cosmetic.

        Not that people should be playing any game that’s infested with a microtransaction funding model. Let alone one with a base price of $45, let alone one with absolutely absurd “micro”-transactions meant to prey on mentally ill people, let alone one that’s already taken people’s free money only to implement all of the above.

        At one point in time horse armor was enough cause controversy. How did it all go so wrong?

        • cole@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 天前

          fair point!

          I do agree. I even call the macrotransactions in star citizen.

          I’m hopeful for squadron 42 but at this point I no longer have much free time to put into star citizen anyways

      • ripcord
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 天前

        Eh,depending on which state the “economy” is in, it can be pretty hard. There’s threads all over spectrum about how Grundy and broken things always are.

        If there was much game to actually win, I would definitely call it pay to win.