• a_non_monotonic_function
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    28 days ago

    Dude, in your first couple of posts you only managed to cite yourself. XD Peer review my ass. XD

    This is not a serious conversation.

    • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Sigh. I linked to a comment I had previously made, which links to the author of Sex Redefined (peer-reviewed paper) clarifying that there are two sexes, and quote her inline for easy reading.

      You’re right that I don’t link to the paper there, but it’s in the grandparent comment. Hit the “Show Context” button to get the link. Just so you can’t evade again, here’s the link:

      https://www.nature.com/articles/518288a

      That’s a peer-reviewed paper published in Nature by a PhD Developmental Biology. When asked to clarify, She directly stated that the papers claims there are two sexes.

      You have no excuse to not engage with it. Stop acting in bad faith.

      EDIT: You originally responded in the thread for my comment that linked directly to this peer reviewed paper, so you have no excuse. Stop your bullshit:

      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-025-03348-3