Seen lots of people at the comments section complain about chinese characters, but I got these:

doubling over until his cap nearly slips off. "ableView finally catching on

The Magic Sphere hums on a pedestal woven from licorice ropes, its surface swirling with imprisoned starlight “…/static/placeholder.png”…/static/placeholder.png"and fractured reflections

Why was the old model even replaced in first place?

  • Vis8908English
    2·
    16 days ago

    I have to agree here. The new model is only marginally better in some areas. Yet it still suffers from:

    1. Overly metaphorical descriptions of useless/non-plot driving environmental objects and phenomena. Still seems to have a hardcoded obsession with smells (Even in dialogue)
    2. Obsession with stage directions. (Knuckles whiten etc.)
    3. Still has a limited pool of names, referentials, examples.

    I also found quite a few problems with dialogue generation

    1. Tweeness and Sentimentality: “Remember when Grandma (Always referred to as a proper noun regardless of relationship to speaker) used to bring us freshly baked cookies to school?”
    2. Gaslighting and Negation: I don’t know if this is a personal problem, but the characters seem to be extremely gaslighting (I didn’t tell them to be that) and constantly negate my statements with ‘Bullshit’. Gets very agitating after a while.
    3. Tries way to hard to be funny and falls completely flat: “This place smells like regret and stale beer.” (Two problems in one: obsession with smells and an overused AI trope) Other than that, the dialogue is slightly better and less all-out than the previous model.

    Outside knowledge is satisfactory but not fantastic.

    So yeah, it’s better and perfectly fine for a free tool, but not nearly up to ChatGPT levels.