silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 days agoUS Supreme Court to Hear Case on Louisiana’s Eroding Coast: Local governments are suing oil companies over environmental damage. Companies want the suits moved out of state courts to friendlier venuewww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square5linkfedilinkarrow-up181arrow-down10cross-posted to: law[email protected]
arrow-up181arrow-down1external-linkUS Supreme Court to Hear Case on Louisiana’s Eroding Coast: Local governments are suing oil companies over environmental damage. Companies want the suits moved out of state courts to friendlier venuewww.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square5linkfedilinkcross-posted to: law[email protected]
minus-squarereddig33linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 days agoThis is just so petty of these huge, extremely wealthy companies. It would cost them a pittance of their wealth to restore disturbed or removed wetlands. Doing so could even give them some “we’re a good neighbor” PR.
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 days agoThey really don’t want a precedent of being liable for environmental damage.
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoPlus they’re of the “rather spend a million in court than spend a thousand on environmental mitigation” school of parasites.
This is just so petty of these huge, extremely wealthy companies. It would cost them a pittance of their wealth to restore disturbed or removed wetlands. Doing so could even give them some “we’re a good neighbor” PR.
They really don’t want a precedent of being liable for environmental damage.
Plus they’re of the “rather spend a million in court than spend a thousand on environmental mitigation” school of parasites.