• Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Autocompletions in fish also take history into account, which saves you a lot of typing in the long run.

    Fish shell script is much more sensibly constructed than bash so it’s just much easier to write a script in fish.

    • voodooattack
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Fish was amazing when I first discovered it, but I found it had too many problems for me to effectively use it. Having to adapt existing bash/zsh scripts was a major problem for me.

      So I went the other way around and managed to get all of the Fish features I wanted working under zsh using atuin, starship, and other misc. oh-my-zsh plugins to fill the gaps.

      Best part: I used a git-controlled home-manager setup to do it so I can activate my entire environment on a fresh machine/server in minutes after I clone it.

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why bother adapting existing scripts?

        They’re happy running as they are in bash/zsh.

        • voodooattack
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          They were mine. People rice their DEs, which I don’t care much about tbh… but I rice my shell even more obsessively.