• shalafi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I have a few tiny guns like that. It would jam on the next shot from limp wristing it. She bought it because it was cute, has no idea how to use it.

    For the life of me I cannot see why training requirements violate the 2A.

    • Seleni
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Because racists would inevitably set the requirements.

    • metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I still think well-regulated militias should be a pre-requisite for owning firearms, at least as far as compliance with the 2A. Like have them be registered and require at least biannual training and ammo inventories, and there you go, easy. But something at least.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      For the life of me I cannot see why training requirements violate the 2A.

      I think in a perfect world, we should have some sort of impartial training. In the world we live in, I wouldn’t trust Trump’s administration to set the training requirements. I’m sure step 1 would involve turning over your social media accounts.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Not to mention the guy is holding the buttstock under his armpit and he’s got his other hand all the way up at the end of the rail guard…

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Any time you interact with a 2A online they will swear to high heaven that they personally keep their guns locked in a childproof vault and make safety priority one.