• paulcdb
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I mean, the rich are benefiting from all the ad spending which is all that matters! /s

    People really need to remember that you’re paying for the ads regardless of if you see them. The only people who lose out are those who show the ads and giving the amount of websites these days that are solely built around showing ads, I really have no sympathy for them.

    The bigger question no-one seems to ask is, how much cheaper would products be if they weren’t spending trillions on ads in the first place?

    • Cactopuses
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Depends on the product, a lot of things exist to be ad bate, and don’t really serve a wider purpose. Tshirts is an example that comes to mind where people just buy dozens of designs they never wear.

      The whole premise has become shopping is the fun activity, the product is just the waste from that activity that needs to be discarded.

      So I guess sans ads we would see a lot less arbitrary products (and places like Amazon would take a hit [yay])

      I would be curious to know how e-commerce would change though as without ads people would likely gravitate to the big box stores