• @rbhfd
    link
    31 year ago

    How does the state of NY define it? But that seems like very clear cut rape to me.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      211 year ago

      Without going into the sordid details, Carroll couldn’t prove whether Trump used his penis or his finger (although she claims both), and it has to be a penis in New York Law for it to be rape. So it went to the lesser verdict of ‘sexual abuse.’ It’s really a technical thing. Most people would consider him using his finger to be rape too, I would wager.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      NY defines rape as penetration with a penis. Since he penetrated her with his fingers, it could only be considered sexual assault by NY’s definition. Worth noting that she claimed he penetrated her with both, but could only prove in court that he penetrated her with his fingers.

      This judge basically ruled that while he wasn’t found guilty of raping her based on NY’s narrow definition, the colloquial use of the word rape is functionally what he did to her.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Wait. Really? Still? What backwards planet are we still living that one of the largest states has deemed that men can’t be raped by women?