I haven’t thought about it in a while but the premise of the article rings true. Desktops are overall disposable. Gpu generations are only really significant with new cpu generations. CPUs are the same with real performance needed a new chipset and motherboard. At that point you are replacing the whole system.

Is there a platform that challenges that trend?

Edit Good points were made. There is a lot to disagree with in the article, especially when focused on gaming.

Storage For the love of your data : storage is a WEAR component. Especially with HDD. Up until recently storage was so cheap it was crazy not to get new drives every few years.

Power Supplies Just because the computer still boots doesn’t mean the power supply is still good. A PSU will continue to shove power into your system long past the ability to provide clean power. Scope and test an older PSU before you put it on a new build.

  • worhuiOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This isn’t against desktops. It’s against idea that a desktop is significantly more future proof than another form factor.

    • testaccount372920@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The previous comment gives a pretty clear argument for why desktops are more future proof, I think. Being more repairable is a pretty big deal for the longevity of the whole system.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Not sure what “future proof” means, but my PC still has its original case from Windows Vista times, has seen 2 mobo replacements, 1 PSU replacement, and I don’t even know how many hard drive / SSD additions / swaps. RAM extensions too. Used to have a GPU but after the 2nd mobo/CPU replacement I dropped it.

      Different screens, keyboards, and mice.

      None of this would have easily been possible on a laptop.

      In a world where hardware is getting more expensive again you are really sending the wrong message here.

      Not to speak of environmental impact & consumerism.

      • worhuiOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        Your history sounds exactly like the spiral of component replacement that is being discussed. it sounds like your replaced everything multiple times, but just kept the case.