On Monday, a group of more than 50 on-set employees filed a petition for an election to be represented by IATSE.

  • Zellith
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    Investors, bigwigs and big name actors I would guess.

    • @givesomefucks
      link
      English
      151 year ago

      And the companies that act as middlemen.

      If they pay a vfx studio 10 million, not even a tenth of that goes to salary. And what does, gets sucked up by executives at the company.

      That system should at least mean steady work for the artists, but then they only have jobs while the company has a project

    • realcaseyrollinsOP
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Actually, it’s either a) big name actors who are demanding more money upfront because of disappearing residuals, or b) shooting in expensive locations. There are many such cases of both of these factors coming together to create a perfect storm too.

      Say what you will about Sound Of Freedom, but that movie was made on a $14.5 million dollar budget by an indie studio shooting at economic locations while not overpaying the main cast. If this was made by a major studio, I bet it would cost about $75 million at least to make the same looking movie with equivalent-calibre actors and similar looking locations. (It should also be pointed out that Angel Studios has already agreed to the Hollywood unions’ terms, so it’s likely they have already been giving their actors and writers fair residuals for awhile now, due to their low resistance to the terms.)