• yaroto98
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 天前

    Bring on support for more devices, and I’ll likely switch with my next phone.

    • gravitas@lem.ugh.im
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      22 小时前

      Its not up to grapheneos devs which devices support bootloader relocking with different keys, literally only pixels allow this and without it you cant properly secure the phone.

      • unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 小时前

        …without it you cant properly secure the phone.

        My understanding is that a locked bootloader helps protect against evil maid attacks and bootloader-level malware persistence. I find this a security risk that I would absolutely take for Google independence. “Properly secure” is subjective.

        GrapheneOS do decide what phones they support. It is exactly their choice to support only Google Pixels, rather than taking a security hit for hardware independence (whether you agree with the decision or not).

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 小时前

          GrapeneOS have a specific goal related to security. You can install one of the others, like LineageOS, if you are happy with the tradeoff.

        • yaroto98
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 小时前

          Exactly, seems like this should be up to the consumer. The devs can say: pixels have best security, here’s a 2nd and 3rd option, here’s their pros and cons.

          Because as much as I approve of privacy measures and security, my phone doesn’t have any lock screen. No pin, no biometrics, nothing.

          I work from home, I don’t really travel, I have 4 children. Physical security is annoying. I want grapheneos for data security. I don’t have people trying to steal my phone, I do have people constantly stealing my data.

          And without a non-pixel option (fuck google), I’m likely to go for to a competitor because, while their data security might not be as good as graphene, it is better than what I currently have.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 小时前

          No other phone supports the relocking bootloader and that is there requirement. There is no other phone they can support. You might not like their requirements but they are pretty clear about it.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 天前

      They’re working on an alternative device with a large OEM they’ve not disclosed yet. They’re aiming at releasing it in 2027.

      • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 天前

        The smart money is they’re going to go with Motorola, honestly idc who they go with it’ll likely be my next phone

          • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 天前

            I’ve got the pixel 8 with graphene on it, it’s very nice but I also have a soft spot for emulation and the Tensor devices are trash for anything higher than GameCube tbh

            • Auli@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 小时前

              I wouldn’t hold out an the GrapheneOS phone being any better. I hope I’m wrong but I’m not expecting top tier specs. I’m betting low specs (crappy screen) with a high price.