• kirklennon
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They didn’t steal anything. He wrote a non-fiction account of a historical event. The Apple TV+ movie is a somewhat fictionalized account of a historical event with the direct support of the primary people actually involved. They don’t owe him a penny. At most his contribution is an inspiration that, hey, this could make a great movie, which isn’t worth any money.

      • kirklennon
        link
        fedilink
        12
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I trust the little guy.

        The editor of Gizmodo knows very well that “Apple” gets clicks and in this case he’s trying to generate free press for his obscure book. His suit doesn’t quite meet the standard of “frivolous,” so I don’t think anybody is getting sanctioned for it, but it’s certainly not filed in good faith. It’s not even an issue of “trust.” What he claims is inherently ridiculous. You can’t copyright historical events, and presenting it as a Cold War thriller isn’t some radical creative choice of “tone.” The dry facts are pretty thrilling on their own, and the extra-thrilling parts (car chase) are inventions of the film.

        How many other people are they doing this to?

        Not stealing from? Literally billions of other people are being treated the same way by Apple every day.

        • meseek #2982
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Sad the voice of reason is getting downvoted because people here have this peculiar belief that Apple is 100% wrong just by virtue of being a giant company.

          Gizmodo has a sorted history with Apple and have demonstrated time and time again they are trash media that lie, steal, cheat to get clicks.

              • @HollandJim
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                Yeah, I didn’t think you had any real skin in the game, poser. lol.