So this came after the Bolshevik-Makhnovist conflict, where “After Nykyfor Hryhoriv mutinied against the Bolsheviks, tensions between the two factions culminated with the Makhnovists being declared outlaws and Makhno resigning his command within the Red Army.” So they were consistently breaking agreements they’d made, refused to surrender and reintegrate with the Red Army to fight the greater Polish-Soviet war, and were thus declared outlaws. Not a great look imo.
What can be asserted without evidence can be discarded without evidence.
Which is why mikas comment can be dismissed, and you’re ignoring the personal attack.
So are we not counting the Bolsheviks as “communists” when they murdered their anarchist allies? Because they certainly said they were.
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/goldman/works/1922/bolsheviks-shooting-anarchists.html
So this came after the Bolshevik-Makhnovist conflict, where “After Nykyfor Hryhoriv mutinied against the Bolsheviks, tensions between the two factions culminated with the Makhnovists being declared outlaws and Makhno resigning his command within the Red Army.” So they were consistently breaking agreements they’d made, refused to surrender and reintegrate with the Red Army to fight the greater Polish-Soviet war, and were thus declared outlaws. Not a great look imo.
Dude responded faithfully until this comment, that’s so weird. I suppose life got busy in the utopia.
Thanks for the link, I’ll read this later.
Literally everyone here thinks you have the stupidest fucking take.
And? Enjoy your bricks
Better than boots.
Heyyyyyyy so it looks like that guy actually responded to you, don’t go now! I just got a fresh batch of popcorn!