• Carrolade
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sure. But it’s legitimacy is irrelevant so long as they believe it, which they do.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d say the provenance of those beliefs is relevant, since it tells you what kind of rubes we’re talking about. A 2000-year-old religion is one thing, even if its foundational beliefs are mythical. Some half-assed bullshit cobbbled together by a gaggle of late-19th-century and early-20th-century hucksters doesn’t even have the excuse that at least they built a few cathedrals, wrote some good music and did some good paintings, along with all the life-denying superstition and oppression.

      • Carrolade
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Was it news to you that religious nuts were kinda uneducated?

        Regardless, I’m still asking about the content of the bullshit prophecy, not whether it’s bullshit or not. Discussing it’s actual merits or lack thereof seems like a waste of time to me. I mean, we’re talking about a literal prophecy. Those generally aren’t taken seriously by your average even halfway intelligent person.

    • errer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think the point is if what they believe in is a string of randomly connected bits of fiction, it’s not too much of a leap to think that they would omit or include a new bit of fiction to fit whatever the situation currently is.