The next version of an international council needs actual authoritative power. There’s no point if someone just decides they don’t want to listen and will do whatever they want. Veto power should be curtailed if a supermajority of countries are in agreement otherwise a bad actor will push their weight around.

  • someguy3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    And poof no countries ever sign into it. That’s the issue.

    • Mantzy81@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      That’s how the EU works (a union of countries).
      It’s how UK works (union of countries).
      It’s how the US, India, Australia, Germany work (union of states).
      It’s how Canada works (union of provinces).

      Literally it’s how all unions work. Essentially it should be like making the world one country beholden to each other for the good and harmony of all. It’s not such a bold idea as, and I’m sure I mentioned previously, it’s how ALL unions work.

      • someguy3
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yeah no, and your examples got progressively more ridiculous. Just no. Sorry that’s one of the dumbest takes I’ve ever seen. There’s not any point in saying anything past that.

        • Mantzy81@aussie.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Spoken like someone who wants to take advantage of others. Thank you for showing your cards.

          The whole point of a union is rules for all, not just for some. Equality, or even equity, not “some more equal than others”.

          • someguy3
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            Your attack doesn’t even make any sense. Ok I really have to leave it at that.