As the title.

Should there be a new rule added where intentional removal of credits and watermarks from other peoples works be deleted?

Only thing i can think against it is if the original artist isn’t known. Usually someone in the comments finds it though

  • FelixCress
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is your name “a community”? I for one don’t care either way. I can always ask an OP if I want to know who created a strip I liked if a signature is missing.

    • surewhynotlem
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, I solely represent the entire community and we all agree on this topic.

      Or, and this is even crazier, I saw the many threads where Beep was downvoted to shit and berated because of this, and I’m able to summarize that information.

      But no, that can’t be right because it means you’re not the center of the universe. It must be that first one.

      • FelixCress
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        But no, that can’t be right because it means you’re not the center of the universe. It must be that first one.

        According to you, it is yourself who is the centre. Go figure 🙄

        • surewhynotlem
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m not sure that aggregating other people’s data and then summarizing it counts as me being self-centered. But maybe I just don’t understand how that word works.

          • FelixCress
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Nope, you moron. Introducing your own views as “we as community” however does.