• @vaseltarp
    link
    951 year ago

    Completely independent of the baby having rights or not it is obviously endangering someone if they do not let them leave to see a doctor when the person has pain.

    • guyrocket
      link
      fedilink
      301 year ago

      Yeah. This struck me as depraved and insane that an employee could not leave work for more than 2 hours for medical reasons. How completely bozotic.

      • JBloodthorn
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        Probably so understaffed to cut costs that her leaving would leave the prisoners unsupervised. Mammon rejoices.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          If she’s having a medical emergency, is she capable of supervising the prisoners? Seems to me like they were unsupervised whether she was there or not.

          • TechyDad
            link
            41 year ago

            Exactly. Swap out the pregnant woman having pains with a man having a possible heart attack. Saying “sorry, but you can’t leave for to go to the hospital for at least 2 hours” would be a massive violation of that worker’s civil rights and would open the employer to a huge lawsuit.

            Of course, the added “fetus’ rights” element just exposes the hypocrisy of the Texas government. When it benefits them, every fetus is a full blown person and doing anything that could hurt said fetus is murder. However, when it doesn’t benefit them, then the fetus has no rights and contributing to its death should have no legal repercussions whatsoever.

          • JBloodthorn
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            They don’t actually give a shit as long as there is an ass in a chair and a stamp in the logs. Unless something goes wrong, then it would have been her fault.