Mitch McConell says the quiet part out loud.

Exact full quote from CNN:

“People think, increasingly it appears, that we shouldn’t be doing this. Well, let me start by saying we haven’t lost a single American in this war,” McConnell said. “Most of the money that we spend related to Ukraine is actually spent in the US, replenishing weapons, more modern weapons. So it’s actually employing people here and improving our own military for what may lie ahead.”

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/4085063

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    42
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    russia can end this whenever they want by restoring Ukraine’s territorial integrity, if they think the US is benefiting so much from it at their expense. The US is just making it much harder for russia to reach its maximalist goals: to conquer Ukraine. One of those is a war crime, the other one is supporting international law.

    • queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      -111 year ago

      International law is when you support a government coup to replace the pro-Russia government with a pro-EU/pro-NATO government.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        International law is when russia does not annex Crimea because of the unfavourable internal affairs of its neighbour. You know, your power ends at “these” borders and from there to here you can’t threaten the Ukrainian President.

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          -51 year ago

          The coup government illegally removed the previous president, so they don’t get to complain when Crimea illegally votes to join Russia.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            9
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yea, well, did you hear about how the President escaped and the Parliament voted to destitute him. And when you invade Crimea to do a mock referendum, that’s awesome international law. Not even Iran and China recognize the annexation of Crimea, because you can’t invade a country and referendum an annexation unilaterally.

            • queermunist she/her
              link
              fedilink
              -41 year ago

              The parliament had no constitutional authority to vote to expell him without an impeachment hearing, which he never got. It was an illegal move.

              The referendum in Crimea is as legitimate as the acting president of Ukraine.

              • @kmkz_ninja
                link
                11 year ago

                And tankies love it when America invades another country because that country didn’t democracy correctly.

                • queermunist she/her
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -3
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t support Russia invading, just so we’re clear. I can just see the rational progression of events from A to Z

                  Why do you think Russia invaded? Cuz Russia bad? lol

                  Ukraine is literally on Russia’s boarder, and Russia is not even a regional empire - it’s a jumped up gas station. Russia is vulnerable and knows it, so it lashes out like any animal backed into a corner. Now we have another forever war, this time in Europe.

                  • @kbotc
                    link
                    English
                    31 year ago

                    I don’t support Russia invading, just so we’re clear.

                    Then why are you using Russia’s talking points?

      • @Grosboel
        link
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ah yes, the revolution to overthrow the Russian puppet who gave the government dictatorial powers so that it could arrest anyone they wanted for years at a time without a trial, was a bad thing.

        I think they just should’ve accepted their fate while their country became a dictatorial hell hole.

        Bro, you’re just straight up evil.

    • Pili
      link
      fedilink
      -191 year ago

      Alright but what would guarantee Russia’s safety after they do that? It’s obviously not in their interest. What they want is to negotiate a peace treaty, which is why they are holding their defense line so strongly until their opponents are exhausted.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          If a coup happened tomorrow in Canada and the new government was suddenly allying itself with China and asking for Chinese military bases to be placed along the border with the US I guarantee that America would invade Canada within the year to “protect itself” against the “Chinese invasion.”

          When you’re a country on the other side of the world and you’re trying to put troops in place to surround a country you’ve arbitrarily decided is your “enemy” then that’s a clear, open threat.

          Would you have believed Russia saying that their troop buildup on the border of Ukraine in 2021 was “defensive?” If not why would you expect Russia to believe the same of nato? Russia at the time was claiming there was no intent to invade, just like NATO does.

          • @SwingRiver
            link
            61 year ago

            America wouldn’t invade they would follow the Cuba missile crisis playbook: destabilize the regime, support opposition factions, and institute economic sanctions. Russia is the only one that has a recent history of invading neighbors.

            NATO troops have been in Poland and the Baltics since '04 and there were positive relations between Russia and NATO during the war on terror period. Relations started to deteriorate when Putin decided to brand NATO as anti-Russian in late 2000s. Back then he saw the writing on the wall that a majority of Ukrainian people wanted to align more with the West which threatened his bloc.

          • @kbotc
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            When you’re a country on the other side of the world and you’re trying to put troops in place to surround a country you’ve arbitrarily decided is your “enemy” then that’s a clear, open threat.

            The US already had bases closer to Moscow and St. Petersburg than Ukraine! As soon as Russia invaded Crimea, the US stationed a shitload of troops in the Baltic states that are part of NATO. Every part of Ukraine’s further from Russia’s center of power as compared to the deployments of Operation Atlantic Resolve.

            There’s not a damn thing that Ukraine would do to benefit the US militarily other than securing non-Russian nuclear plants to provide power to the EU. Russia is going after a war of retribution and hydrocarbon imperialism for leaving it’s sphere of influence.

          • @eran_morad
            link
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Russia has a long history of invading its European neighbors and an unabashed imperial ambition (pathetic shithole though it is). When was the last time a nato country attacked russia? Edit: you gonna answer the question, or just downvote like a bitch?

          • @diffuselight
            link
            -11 year ago

            You forgot the part where the Us first needs to annex Quebec a few years earlier.

      • @diffuselight
        link
        11 year ago

        Nuclear Arms. The ones they accepted from Ukraine in return for security guarantees. Which they violated when they took Crimea already.

        How on your mind do you think attacking Ukraine guaranteed their security? Like how was that a “oh this will make us more secure move” By driving all other Neighbors into NAtOs nuclear shields ?

        That’s big brain energy right now. I’m afraid of the entire neighborhood, especially the guy next door who gave me their shotgun in exchange for safety 2 decades ago , let me rape their wife and abduct their children and annex their house, that’ll show the neighborhood, especially if I manage to show that I barely can take the front lawn before getting spanked.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -11 year ago

        What I heard were rumors that the “UN” could sort of hold Ukraine’s occupied territories “in escrow” as a DMZ buffer, but it’s not a final solution (we know how these handovers have turned sour in the past), because eventually you’d have to divide it, or create a new country…the essential is that russia does not get rewarded for its aggression with territory to brag about in the history books and that there is no chance that any native pro-russian Ukrainian in the buffer zone suffers reprisals…