Sure, if they could identify an instance in which he “engaged in insurrection or rebellion […], or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof”. Biden has never committed such an offense, so in order for red states to attempt this they’d have to fabricate facts and have a sufficient number of state officials go along with it, essentially The Big Lie 2.0.
Trump runs into a issue with the Fourteenth Amendment where states can block him from the ballot. Only a 2/3 vote in Congress can prevent that.
Ok, aside from bad fanfic what is the way he’s not the nominee and on the ballot in all 51 electoral jurisdictions?
deleted by creator
And the beauty of this is it only takes a few swing states blocking him on the ballot to wreck his election.
Isn’t the opposite true though as well? Can’t red states just make up reasons to remove biden if a conviction isn’t required?
Sure, if they could identify an instance in which he “engaged in insurrection or rebellion […], or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof”. Biden has never committed such an offense, so in order for red states to attempt this they’d have to fabricate facts and have a sufficient number of state officials go along with it, essentially The Big Lie 2.0.
It is insurrection specific so states would have the burden of proving (if they cared about proof) Biden was engaged with an insurrection.
I mean when even the federalist society are penning their opinions on various publications supporting such a position…
Legally he can not be on the ballot in any of the 51 electoral jurisdictions per the United States Consitution.
Lol I wish. Where’d you get your law degree, Arby’s?
It’s right there in the Consitution of the United States. You are welcome to read it yourself.
https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/14th-amendment.htm
Neat, now apply it correctly to the current fact pattern. I can make up fun thought experiments, too.
If you don’t want to read it that is up to you. Thanks for playing.