Nope it was on TV. It was about the Helen Parrs shape in the Incredibles so it was in 2004 or 2005. Do you understand what I said is about the context of why all of the animated female characters for over thirty years have thic thighs and small busts? What I said was giving you context about the imagery and why it ended up that way. You lack context and as a result don’t know what you are talking about. You think the timeline for this started in 2010’s with the me too movement. You call me either a zoomer or a boomer. You are a millennial and as usual wrong.
Not a boomer millennial. You don’t understand that what you are saying isn’t anything at all. The movies in the image are prime examples of a shift that occurred before you were capable of comprehending it. Even if you had born yet. You don’t get that for me growing up animated women had larger busts. For example: Heavy metal, Aeon Flux and Who framed Roger Rabbit. Then there was a shift away from that to to larger thighs which is what the image is conveying. Its a basic statement about how kids growing up are influence by what they see. One that I made sure my millennial daughter understood and didn’t try to bend herself in to a unreasonable self image.
My statement had nothing to do with gamer gate or the me too movement. There had been push back about the over sexualization of animated characters for decades before the movies in the image were made. Things happened before you had matured enough to notice them. Somehow you choose to ignore it since doing so would be admission of an error on your part. That is another error and it is yours not mine.
You don’t like what I’m saying but you can’t say anything that of any substance against it. You think somehow I’m the one who doesn’t understand but its you that don’t and now you are angry and trying silence me with some weird statement about accountability. I’m not the one who drew the animated characters I just made reference to something that is easily verifiable if you are inclined to do so. Which you are not. After all you wouldn’t want your simple world view to shift.
Someone in this thread has already posted a link about how women are drawn and why they are drawn that way. I don’t think you ware willing or even capable of really understand the context of the image above and what it means. Its nothing new and for me nothing unrecognized.
So as you have left me with a curse I leave you with one
Nope it was on TV. It was about the Helen Parrs shape in the Incredibles so it was in 2004 or 2005. Do you understand what I said is about the context of why all of the animated female characters for over thirty years have thic thighs and small busts? What I said was giving you context about the imagery and why it ended up that way. You lack context and as a result don’t know what you are talking about. You think the timeline for this started in 2010’s with the me too movement. You call me either a zoomer or a boomer. You are a millennial and as usual wrong.
Shut the fuck up boomer, time for bed.
Didn’t listen to a fucking word I said, can’t take accountability for fucking anything, then you put a bunch of words in my mouth.
Shut. The. Fuck. Up.
Not a boomer millennial. You don’t understand that what you are saying isn’t anything at all. The movies in the image are prime examples of a shift that occurred before you were capable of comprehending it. Even if you had born yet. You don’t get that for me growing up animated women had larger busts. For example: Heavy metal, Aeon Flux and Who framed Roger Rabbit. Then there was a shift away from that to to larger thighs which is what the image is conveying. Its a basic statement about how kids growing up are influence by what they see. One that I made sure my millennial daughter understood and didn’t try to bend herself in to a unreasonable self image.
My statement had nothing to do with gamer gate or the me too movement. There had been push back about the over sexualization of animated characters for decades before the movies in the image were made. Things happened before you had matured enough to notice them. Somehow you choose to ignore it since doing so would be admission of an error on your part. That is another error and it is yours not mine.
You don’t like what I’m saying but you can’t say anything that of any substance against it. You think somehow I’m the one who doesn’t understand but its you that don’t and now you are angry and trying silence me with some weird statement about accountability. I’m not the one who drew the animated characters I just made reference to something that is easily verifiable if you are inclined to do so. Which you are not. After all you wouldn’t want your simple world view to shift.
Someone in this thread has already posted a link about how women are drawn and why they are drawn that way. I don’t think you ware willing or even capable of really understand the context of the image above and what it means. Its nothing new and for me nothing unrecognized.
So as you have left me with a curse I leave you with one
“May everyone you meet be just like you.”