Applying the Disqualification Clause to Trump’s actions should not be a partisan issue. The article is particularly significant since it was written by two conservative legal scholars who subscribe to originalism, long a marginalized theory but now ubiquitous among the right-wingers on the Supreme Court. The reasoning of Baude and Paulsen may well resonate with them.
If there’s one thing that pisses me off more than Republicans, it’s liberals acting like Republicans still play by any rules, and just need to be convinced by the right argument.
If there’s one thing that pisses me off more than Republicans, it’s liberals acting like Republicans still play by any rules, and just need to be convinced by the right argument.
Applying the Disqualification Clause to Trump’s actions should not be a partisan issue. The article is particularly significant since it was written by two conservative legal scholars who subscribe to originalism, long a marginalized theory but now ubiquitous among the right-wingers on the Supreme Court. The reasoning of Baude and Paulsen may well resonate with them.
Right? What an utterly naive interpretation of mechanism in the American court system.
“Lol, no.” -Clarence Thomas
If there’s one thing that pisses me off more than Republicans, it’s liberals acting like Republicans still play by any rules, and just need to be convinced by the right argument.
This x1000 my dude.
“Reality can be whatever I want.” –Clarence Thomas/Donald Trump/GOP in general
Right? What an utterly naive interpretation of mechanism in the American court system.
I imagined Thomas saying that. Spot on.