He’s not saying those are the issues tho…

He’s saying that viewers won’t watch shit made by AI because we have higher standards…

Which is a very ignorant statement, just fucking look at reality TV, the lowest common denominator is always the target audience, and the lowest common denominator won’t even notice AI wrote a show/movie.

The BAFTA winner recently gave his opinions on the limitations of artificial intelligence, which he noted “doesn’t have a soul,” explaining why “I feel protected” the technology as a creative.

“Creativity is safe from AI because creativity has to do with the human experience. It’s about emotions, it’s about understanding one another,” he said on Spain’s El Hormiguero talk show.

“AI can sift through data, but it can’t understand people’s emotions. It doesn’t understand the difference between being happy and being sad,” added Holland. “The way artists paint, it’s not about what they’re copying, it’s about expressing themselves, so I feel protected. [AI] doesn’t have a soul.”

He’s right about AIs lack of ability.

But he’s wrong about how many people seem to be incapable of noticing obvious AI.

Or corporations being the ones to decide what is made.

Like, with every aspect of AI, people don’t want it, but that hasn’t stopped anyone from shoving it down our throats yet.

But in the hands of people that ARE creative and intentional with it, there a good use cases

Hard disagree.

If anyone thinks they’re being creative with AI, it means their brains have already started rotting from AI usage.