New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, once a figure of contention among leaders from both major political parties, has seen a remarkable surge in his political standing just six months into office.

The 34-year-old democratic socialist, a prominent figure on the progressive left, has garnered unexpected praise from both Donald Trump and New York Governor Kathy Hochul.

He has also emerged as the face of the region’s sports renaissance. Now, days before New York’s primary elections,

  • bthest
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    lol You mean a presidential race got more votes than a mayoral race? Ya don’t say?

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mamdani got 51% of the vote going against sex criminal Cuomo and shock jock Silwa.

      Harris got about 65% of the NYC vote.

      No way can you pretend that ‘the Left’ beat the dems.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Mamdani got 51% of the vote going against sex criminal Cuomo and shock jock Silwa.

        That’s still over 9% more than the runner up got.

        In a three way election.

        Without the support of his own party.

        With tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars spent on 24/7 smear campaigns against him by both major parties.

        With a unanimous local billionaire-owned media alliance fearmongering about him.

        While spending a total of $10.7m


        Compared to all that, the unequivocal DNC leader getting 65% in a presidential election where 100% of the party political machine was behind her, she was the only alternative to a literal fascist idiot and also sex criminal experiencing severe cognitive decline, and they spent over a billion dollars is absolutely PATHETIC.

      • DrWorm
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        Because general elections historically always have higher turn out. I think that’s what they’re trying to get at specifically.

        • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          1 day ago

          Mamdani got fewer total votes AND a smaller percentage of the vote than Harris.

          If you try to push the narrative that Mamdani and the Left were super popular you’re deluding yourself.

          Hopefully he keeps doing a great job and brings in more voters.

          But be real. He got very lucky when Adams got caught in a big scandal, and the only candidate the regular Party could find was already saddled with a giant scandal.

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Higher voter turnout changes those percentages. You seem to be thinking that votes scale proportionally with turnout? That’s not always the case.

            Anyway the more candidates you have the more split the vote will be. Plus the media/Trump campaign didn’t pump millions of dollars into a smear campaign against Harris in NY. Why? Because they didn’t expect to turn NY red so they focused resources elsewhere.

            An insane sum of money was spent trying to put Mamdani down