TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 9 days agono rule infuriates me morelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square268linkfedilinkarrow-up11.21Karrow-down118
arrow-up11.19Karrow-down1imageno rule infuriates me morelemmy.blahaj.zoneTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square268linkfedilink
minus-squareG4ZlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·9 days agoWhat I tend to do, rather than copying the output I just check out the sources it used and then I link those when I’m arguing a point.
minus-squareToga77linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·8 days agoExcept that LLMs often cite completely irrelevant crap or make up citations.
minus-squareG4ZlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 days agoYeah dude, you have to read what’s on the page. Old school I know, but I am old so it’s just what I’ve always done except the LLM found it faster. I do prefer to make arguments without any LLM use, but if I do, I don’t post what it says just the links.
minus-squarePasserby6497linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·8 days agoI wonder if that’s why they check the sources before using them for their argument 🤔
minus-squareToga77linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·8 days agoIt’s incredibly easy to go to a “cited” a link, read a title, and assume the content. No one on the internet right now is actually taking the time to read sources like this guy and if you believe they are I have a bridge to sell you.
minus-squarePasserby6497linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 days agoWeird, didn’t realize my name was “no one”. Either that, or I’m not really on the Internet right now.
minus-squareTheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·8 days agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 days agoSure! Here’s an article from ‘pogromist weekly’ and a scholarly piece published in the journal 1488!
minus-squareTheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·8 days agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareHomosexual sapiens@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 days ago1488 in this context is not a year, it’s a reference to the fourteen words
minus-squareironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoThe whole political spectrum, from the secular pogromist to the fanatical neo-odinist!
minus-squareTheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoRemoved by mod
What I tend to do, rather than copying the output I just check out the sources it used and then I link those when I’m arguing a point.
Except that LLMs often cite completely irrelevant crap or make up citations.
Yeah dude, you have to read what’s on the page.
Old school I know, but I am old so it’s just what I’ve always done except the LLM found it faster.
I do prefer to make arguments without any LLM use, but if I do, I don’t post what it says just the links.
I wonder if that’s why they check the sources before using them for their argument 🤔
It’s incredibly easy to go to a “cited” a link, read a title, and assume the content.
No one on the internet right now is actually taking the time to read sources like this guy and if you believe they are I have a bridge to sell you.
Weird, didn’t realize my name was “no one”. Either that, or I’m not really on the Internet right now.
Removed by mod
Sure! Here’s an article from ‘pogromist weekly’ and a scholarly piece published in the journal 1488!
Removed by mod
1488 in this context is not a year, it’s a reference to the fourteen words
The whole political spectrum, from the secular pogromist to the fanatical neo-odinist!
Removed by mod