I and many others received the biggest payrise of their careers last year.
Inb4 “iTs StIlL a ReAl TeRmS cUt!!!”.
It’s still 8ish percent more than we had, , ,
Edit: Downvote if it makes you feel better, the distinction between a pay rise and a real terms pay rise is quite clear and it’s obvious which this article is talking about. You stating “real terms cut!” is adding nothing to the debate, we are all well aware that it’s a real terms cut!
The average worker in the UK has 8% more pounds in their paycheck than they did last year, you can debate the value of that but it’s besides the point
It might be easier to visualise if you substitute money in for something more tangible. Let’s use water as an example; you might earn a one litre bottle of water for every hour you work. Your company then announces a pay rise accross the board; everyone in the company will now get twice as amny bottles! Sounds great, everyone’s on board, the company gets huge amounts of positive PR. You’re excited when it comes to pay day, just think what you’ll do with all that extra water! But when you get your pay you’re sorely dissapointed; while you did get twice as many bottles of water, each bottle is half the size. You may have got twice as many bottles but you got the exact same amount of water.
In this analogy bottles are currency, water is value. Twice as many bottles is meaningless if they’re half the size. You got a 0% raise.
My problem here isn’t about real terms (which you might notice I didn’t even say). It’s about the fact that in a cost of living crisis this article even exists. It’s incredibly tone deaf and feels very much like a “ooh look at the shiny” slight of hand. “Things can’t be that bad, look wages are growing!” Does that sound like an accurate assessment of the economic situation here right now?
Yes, wages have grown - that’s great but it’s not particularly relevant when a lot of people are reliant on food banks to eat. Including those who have had an 8% pay rise.
Having more money is great, but only when you can actually get more with it.
I may be wrong but I believe the article is paraphrasing the “be modest with your payrise expectations or we’ll have inflation!” nonsense from a few months ago.
Like yh, that’s the problem, nothing to do with a quarter trillion pumped in the the economy during COVID or Brexit.
The elite are once again trying to saddle the common man with the downfalls of the economy whilst they continue to laugh all the way to the bank.
Sorry if I got the wrong end of the stick with your comment.
@13esq@BowserDelta
Money is, at root, promises.
Fungible, serialised, abstracted, standardised, but based on promises.
Inflation occurs when the promises are less completely believed.
I do not say other things could not cause inflation, but a vast liar leading a party of liars, cheats, thieves and incompetents must lead to devaluation of the country’s promises.
What do you mean?
I and many others received the biggest payrise of their careers last year.
Inb4 “iTs StIlL a ReAl TeRmS cUt!!!”.
It’s still 8ish percent more than we had, , ,
Edit: Downvote if it makes you feel better, the distinction between a pay rise and a real terms pay rise is quite clear and it’s obvious which this article is talking about. You stating “real terms cut!” is adding nothing to the debate, we are all well aware that it’s a real terms cut!
The average worker in the UK has 8% more pounds in their paycheck than they did last year, you can debate the value of that but it’s besides the point
It might be easier to visualise if you substitute money in for something more tangible. Let’s use water as an example; you might earn a one litre bottle of water for every hour you work. Your company then announces a pay rise accross the board; everyone in the company will now get twice as amny bottles! Sounds great, everyone’s on board, the company gets huge amounts of positive PR. You’re excited when it comes to pay day, just think what you’ll do with all that extra water! But when you get your pay you’re sorely dissapointed; while you did get twice as many bottles of water, each bottle is half the size. You may have got twice as many bottles but you got the exact same amount of water.
In this analogy bottles are currency, water is value. Twice as many bottles is meaningless if they’re half the size. You got a 0% raise.
My problem here isn’t about real terms (which you might notice I didn’t even say). It’s about the fact that in a cost of living crisis this article even exists. It’s incredibly tone deaf and feels very much like a “ooh look at the shiny” slight of hand. “Things can’t be that bad, look wages are growing!” Does that sound like an accurate assessment of the economic situation here right now?
Yes, wages have grown - that’s great but it’s not particularly relevant when a lot of people are reliant on food banks to eat. Including those who have had an 8% pay rise.
Having more money is great, but only when you can actually get more with it.
I may be wrong but I believe the article is paraphrasing the “be modest with your payrise expectations or we’ll have inflation!” nonsense from a few months ago.
Like yh, that’s the problem, nothing to do with a quarter trillion pumped in the the economy during COVID or Brexit.
The elite are once again trying to saddle the common man with the downfalls of the economy whilst they continue to laugh all the way to the bank.
Sorry if I got the wrong end of the stick with your comment.
@13esq @BowserDelta
Money is, at root, promises.
Fungible, serialised, abstracted, standardised, but based on promises.
Inflation occurs when the promises are less completely believed.
I do not say other things could not cause inflation, but a vast liar leading a party of liars, cheats, thieves and incompetents must lead to devaluation of the country’s promises.