• @ch00f
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    Doesn’t capitalism dictate that the company needs to offer the most compelling price in order to beat the competition?

    Like, nobody has to buy a Tesla. Also, nobody has to buy a software limited version of a Tesla. “Capitalism” is driving people to do both of those things however because people find that the car has a greater value for what they can afford than what other companies offer. How is that bad?

    Like…what exactly do you think the motivation behind essentially giving away batteries for free that nobody can use?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      They arent giving away free batteries, they are wasting batteries by putting them in a situation where they are unusable. Its waste.

      • @ch00f
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I agree. I would argue that the batteries are valuable enough that they will eventually be utilized at some point (like secondary market or if the vehicle happens to last long enough to fully wear out the batteries), but they could certainly be put to better use now. In fact, I’d argue that most 200+ mile range EVs are a waste of batteries, because many consumers don’t realize that they could get by with much cheaper, lighter 100 mile range vehicles. That’s not really the fault of the manufacturer though. I put the blame on consumers who don’t realize that the use case of an EV that you charge at home daily is different than a gasoline vehicle that must be refueled at a station.

        All that aside, this conversation was about how Tesla is greedy for software locking batteries. I’m arguing that giving away unusable batteries is hardly an act of greed.