I dont agree with many things apple does at all, and I also think their password manager has flaws like revealing usernames without authentification.

It is pretty handy though, to have a file where the entries are stored unencrypted, and if the password manager detects an entry it prompts to decrypt exactly that field, maybe with a fingerprint.

KeepassDX needs to run in the background and be completely unlocked to even detect apps or password fields.

Do you know any existing app that can do this?

  • qaz
    cake
    link
    1010 months ago

    You can also self-host Bitwarden using Vaultwarden.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      610 months ago

      You can also run Bitwarden proper locally but unless you really know how to run and maintain a web server I wouldn’t recommend this.

      • qaz
        cake
        link
        3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The official docker image uses a lot more resources than the vaultwarden container, but it allows significantly more than 100 users. If it’s just for yourself and your family I suggest just going with Vaultwarden.

          • qaz
            cake
            link
            110 months ago

            You don’t. I meant to say that only large organizations need the official Bitwarden docker setup, but I did not communicate that clearly enough.

        • Rootiest
          link
          fedilink
          English
          410 months ago

          I think what they meant is that one option uses network connectivity while the other functions entirely offline

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          Which would make it hardly accessible outside of your home. Still not locally saved as well. And imho if he is not sure which password manager he should choose, he should maybe not self host just yet.

          • @Ekpu
            link
            410 months ago

            Bitwarden keeps a local encrypted copy of the database and only connects to the server for synchronisation.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                110 months ago

                Maybe because it seems you claim self-hosting bit warden is cloud only and that self-hosted is not accessible outside the house?
                Note: I do not recommending self-hosting bitwarden

                • Vexz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  210 months ago

                  Note: I do not recommending self-hosting bitwarden

                  Why not? I have my own instance running on my NAS and I love to have it self-hosted because this way I keep the passwords where I know nobody else can get them.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    110 months ago

                    Because a password manager is critical and if you ask me I’d say no. If you have the know how and understand the risk you won’t be asking