Last Wednesday, a day after the wildfires, the county asked visitors to leave Lahaina and the island as a whole as soon as possible.

Officials soon urged people to avoid the island entirely, except for essential travel. “In the days and weeks ahead, our collective resources and attention must be focused on the recovery of residents and communities that were forced to evacuate,” the Hawaii Tourism Authority said.

Many travellers heeded the advice. In the immediate aftermath of the fires, some 46,000 people left the island.

But thousands did not. Some ignored requests to leave Maui immediately, while others flew in after the fire - decisions that have angered some.

“If this was happening to your hometown, would you want us to come?” said resident Chuck Enomoto. “We need to take care of our own first.”

  • @Kbobabob
    link
    -271 year ago

    They hate tourists? I wonder how they would feel if their economy crumbled from no tourists.

    • @BURN
      link
      201 year ago

      Have you been to Hawaii lately?

      The locals aren’t benefitting from tourism. They’re being exploited working minimum wage in tourist supporting jobs, living in much poorer conditions than the tourists on the resorts.

      Their economy could use some scaling back and making it less of a tourist destination. But unfortunately we all know the resorts are just waiting until the instant they can start building on the land that just burned down.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Tourism isn’t the reason housing is so expensive in Hawaii, it’s because it’s an extremely desirable place to live. Reducing tourism without changing anything else wouldn’t help.

        • @BURN
          link
          61 year ago

          Yes, that’s very true. However I’d argue that tourism perpetuates a lot of cycles of poverty on the island.

          Reducing tourism very likely won’t change anything, you’re very right there, but it was a large contributor in bringing it to the point it’s at now.

      • @Kbobabob
        link
        -91 year ago

        You don’t have to like it but it’s still reality. And what kind of insult is that? LMAO

    • themeatbridge
      link
      101 year ago

      As it is with most things, the average local is not benefitting from the commercialization of their communities as much as external corporations and wealthy investors.

      • @Kbobabob
        link
        -101 year ago

        I disagree. Tourists bring money that goes into sales tax and local businesses that are staffed by average locals.

        • Gyoza Power
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          That would be neat if the businesses were actually owned by the locals, rather than rich fucks like Larry Edison

          • @Kbobabob
            link
            11 year ago

            Then you would just have a few wealthy on the island? Unless you think they would actually pay or hire differently.

            • Gyoza Power
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              I would much rather not have any rich fuck owning >90% of the island. Thank you very much.

              • @Kbobabob
                link
                01 year ago

                What is it was a local rich fuck? Seems like the whole “outsider” thing is the issue.

                • Gyoza Power
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  “What if it…”. Bro, just stop. They are both bad, but having a complete outsider own your island is by far the worse one.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Let’s see … chose rebuilding an important historical and cultural center of Native Hawaiians - and provide temporary shelter, food and money until the rebuild is complete - vs cater to rich assholes who own most of Hawaii or just want to visit, even tho 106 are confirmed dead with only 27% of the disaster area searched?

      Choose people over economy every gd time.