The devastating heat wave has exposed weaknesses in the continent’s infrastructure, much of it built for a cooler climate that no longer exists.
The devastating heat wave has exposed weaknesses in the continent’s infrastructure, much of it built for a cooler climate that no longer exists.
In what way is citing the univac prediction “populistic”?
Also, my comments are not needlessly aggressive. My aggression towards those in power who have intentionally allowed us to get to this point, is warranted. If you are going to pretend that it wasn’t intentional on their part, you deserve that ire too. This pretense, that this is simply how slow things move, is poisonous, as it allows those who have harmed us all to continue to do so. Bygones can’t be bygones while the wolves still run the chicken coop.
Nothing about the prediction is populistic. Claiming that one simulation was already given imperative results is populistic. Like I said, it took considerably longer than just until the 1950 until this climate scenario was scientific consensus.
Things do move slowly, not always but if we are talking about radical change of our infrastructure and also uprooting the way the economy works, those things are measured in decades, not years. We can deny that and just detach ourself from reality or work within reality.
To point out anything more detailed, I would need to know what the article actually writes about. I am not saying that there were no failings.
You’ve clearly already detached yourself from reality. I shall not join you for afternoon heads-in-sand. Good day, sire.