So if we say who is included (lesbians gays bisexuals and trans people) everyone not one of those things is excluded, only by keeping close to those things can you be included even if you’re otherwise queer.
The logic of exclusion persists in cultural and institutional memory as well as being personally a piece of shit, as we see with modern groups dropping the T from lgbt, or the ‘acronym too long’ types who aren’t concerned so much with the acronym itself
I can’t imagine anyone other than a transphobe who’s okay with cis-gays reading my explanation competently without brain damage and having this reaction to it. I feel like I was clear, so I’m pretty happy with your displeasure.
How do you possibly deduce that I’m a transphobe from our exchanges? Is that what you’re saying I am? I can’t even follow along with that concave logic here. Just because you feel like you were clear doesn’t mean you were. You are quite biased when you judge your own clarity, you know. This is an insight not everyone has…
It couldn’t be further from the truth if so. I’ve only expressed — explicitly — that I want to be nothing but inclusive.
You just normally go around inserting yourself in threads and making baseless accusations like this?
I noticed your account is quite new. Here on Lemmy we try to be nicer to each other than what was the norm on Reddit. Can we try that now?
Queer has been recommended and then researched by me, so I’ll use that as that seems acceptable.
Could you explain this mind bender?
So if we say who is included (lesbians gays bisexuals and trans people) everyone not one of those things is excluded, only by keeping close to those things can you be included even if you’re otherwise queer.
The logic of exclusion persists in cultural and institutional memory as well as being personally a piece of shit, as we see with modern groups dropping the T from lgbt, or the ‘acronym too long’ types who aren’t concerned so much with the acronym itself
That’s a verbose way of calling me a piece of shit. 🙄
I was just trying to find a term that was easy to remember, as well as inclusive.
People suggested “queer”, I will adopt “queer”. 👍
Have a great day.
You literally asked. Unless you’re one of those “lgb BUT NOT T” people. Then yes, total piece of shit.
Jesus Christ.
Have a good day. I’ve already been helped to be inclusive by other, nice people. Please take your unwarranted and unwanted hostility elsewhere.
I can’t imagine anyone other than a transphobe who’s okay with cis-gays reading my explanation competently without brain damage and having this reaction to it. I feel like I was clear, so I’m pretty happy with your displeasure.
How do you possibly deduce that I’m a transphobe from our exchanges? Is that what you’re saying I am? I can’t even follow along with that concave logic here. Just because you feel like you were clear doesn’t mean you were. You are quite biased when you judge your own clarity, you know. This is an insight not everyone has…
It couldn’t be further from the truth if so. I’ve only expressed — explicitly — that I want to be nothing but inclusive.
You just normally go around inserting yourself in threads and making baseless accusations like this?
I noticed your account is quite new. Here on Lemmy we try to be nicer to each other than what was the norm on Reddit. Can we try that now?
Apparently not. You asked a question about how I got to a conclusion. I answered. You started the hostility.
You’re a troll. Don’t reply to me again.