• @Jackthelad
    link
    English
    -341 year ago

    Maybe, but spare a thought for the ordinary people who would lose their jobs as a result.

    • Lexi Sneptaur
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      They worked at LMG, a highly visible company. They’ll get other jobs no problem.

      • @Jackthelad
        link
        English
        -191 year ago

        Again, that may be the case, but it’s still not good for people to lose their jobs in the first place.

        Especially not in this economy.

        • Lexi Sneptaur
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          I hope every unethical company goes over and everyone who works at all of them remains unemployed for at least 3 months actually. Unethical companies = employees often complacent and part of the problem.

          I don’t see why you want to defend this

          • @Jackthelad
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            I’m not defending the company or the actions of whoever is involved in misconduct. But I also don’t believe in guilt by association.

            Sorry for caring about people’s livelihoods.

            • Lexi Sneptaur
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              It isn’t guilt by association. It’s not caring about several people losing their jobs as a result of their employer’s decision to sexually harass women. The few jobs lost isn’t that big of a deal compared to the trauma the female employees were put through. Those people will have no problem finding new work.

    • @tabular
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      My thoughts go to the dependency on jobs for survival but that leads into a conversation about AI, the end of enough jobs for humans and the need for universal basic income. Job loss doesn’t much affect my choice to interact with a corporation or wish for it to change (which may affect jobs).