YouTube starts mass takedowns of videos promoting ‘harmful or ineffective’ cancer cures | The platform will also take action against videos that discourage people from seeking professional medical …::YouTube will remove content about harmful or ineffective cancer treatments or which “discourages viewers from seeking professional medical treatment.”

  • @Zebov
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    Who determines what is ineffective or harmful?

    I mean chemo isn’t puppies and rainbows.

    • @agent_flounder
      link
      English
      161 year ago

      Maybe let’s go with science?

      Chemo is one thing.

      The Steve Jobs pancreatic cancer buster plan, not so much.

    • @Isthisreddit
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      Science and scientific studies help determine what is ineffective or harmful, the problem is the FDA doesn’t have authority over shit plenty of things - a person can go on YouTube and say drinking their special bottled water will cure cancer, and they don’t fall into FDA guidelines so they are free to claim whatever they want, essentially. These woo-woo type cure-alls have gotten into trouble with the FDA because of their ridiculous and unfactual, unproven claims, but that’s usually where the lawyer wordsmiths show up to change the wording just enough to not get into trouble with the FDA.

      There is a whole history of pseudoscience as an industry and how it was able to bribe/lobby for its current position in public view (since you even have to ask this question)

    • Altima NEO
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean chemo is effective. It fucks you up. But it’s pretty good at “curing” cancer.