There’s a broad compelling argument that a hard border between the US and Canada serves no practical purpose and a merging of the two would make sense.
Of course, you could say the same of the US and Mexico. Or the US and any of the Caribbean islands. Really, the whole hemisphere.
The problem is in the reconciliation of systems. Given their relative quality of life and function of governance, the US should really be joining Canada.
So, I’ll put things this way; at no point in my life will I be an American citizen. I am willing to resort to violence to ensure this. And if the Internet has taught me anything, it’s that I’ve never had an original thought in my life. Do what you will that information.
Would you let your country take over the US to save us from our broken government? We have a coupe things going for us… like… a lot of land. So theres ample parking.
Quite a few. That’s the story of Colonialism, at least in the early era.
American Natives, African kingdoms, and East Asian archipelagos fell like dominos when a colonial power promised a local faction opportunity to oppress their neighbors with foreign support. The English did it. The Romans did it. The Egyptians did it.
Nationalism, in the modern sense, is relatively novel and largely a consequence of language uniformity, mass transit, and mass media. Even then, it’s relatively easy to get - say - a Russian enclave in a Ukrainian state to form a breakaway region at foreign prompting. Or an American political faction to elect a corporate puppet under the guise of “sticking it” to the last person in charge.
Eh, some do, but not a majority. I think only about 30% really do. (Check out theauthoritarians.org for a dude that dedicated 60 years of psychology career to that)
I think it more illustrates the lack of imagination. People would fiercely defend the existence of their national borders, but for some reason they don’t much like the idea of being fenced into their house, for example. I guess there’s an arbitrary level of border that makes people feel nice.
People would fiercely defend the existence of their national borders, but for some reason they don’t much like the idea of being fenced into their house, for example.
People talk a lot of shit. The overwhelming majority will be grumpy if their borders change, but have no interest in bleeding over it.
There’s a broad compelling argument that a hard border between the US and Canada serves no practical purpose and a merging of the two would make sense.
Of course, you could say the same of the US and Mexico. Or the US and any of the Caribbean islands. Really, the whole hemisphere.
The problem is in the reconciliation of systems. Given their relative quality of life and function of governance, the US should really be joining Canada.
It serves to keep americans out of my fucking country.
Never the rich ones.
So, I’ll put things this way; at no point in my life will I be an American citizen. I am willing to resort to violence to ensure this. And if the Internet has taught me anything, it’s that I’ve never had an original thought in my life. Do what you will that information.
Would you let your country take over the US to save us from our broken government? We have a coupe things going for us… like… a lot of land. So theres ample parking.
I’ll believe it when I see it.
The number of armchair revolutionaries dwarfs any actual militancy.
In the history of the world, how many populations have just quietly accepted being conquered by an external force?
Quite a few. That’s the story of Colonialism, at least in the early era.
American Natives, African kingdoms, and East Asian archipelagos fell like dominos when a colonial power promised a local faction opportunity to oppress their neighbors with foreign support. The English did it. The Romans did it. The Egyptians did it.
Nationalism, in the modern sense, is relatively novel and largely a consequence of language uniformity, mass transit, and mass media. Even then, it’s relatively easy to get - say - a Russian enclave in a Ukrainian state to form a breakaway region at foreign prompting. Or an American political faction to elect a corporate puppet under the guise of “sticking it” to the last person in charge.
Your history courses have failed you. Colonialism was far from a peaceful process.
I never said it was peaceful. But the colonized have fought for colonizers more often than against them.
Not only were the colonized accepting of conquest. They were enthusiastic participants.
That’s only when their current government sucked. People being oppressed might welcome a foreign invader.
People don’t welcome foreign oppressors. There may be some small number of collaborators, but things don’t end well for them.
Far more common than you’d guess.
They regionally welcome foreign collaborators. Alberta is a great modern example of Canadians embracing Trumpism on their own terms.
Jesus christ you’re stupid.
Is there anyone out there gaming the best response?
I rolled my eyes. Briefly thought of the Jennifer Lawrence meme.
That’s just an argument the borders serve no useful purpose and should not exist.
Which I 100% agree with, borders are useless wastes of effort for the sole purpose of massaging the egos of people with not enough going on.
/r/UnpopularOpinion
Clearly, the silent majority actually loves a stiff boot on the neck.
Eh, some do, but not a majority. I think only about 30% really do. (Check out theauthoritarians.org for a dude that dedicated 60 years of psychology career to that)
I think it more illustrates the lack of imagination. People would fiercely defend the existence of their national borders, but for some reason they don’t much like the idea of being fenced into their house, for example. I guess there’s an arbitrary level of border that makes people feel nice.
Your downvote margin suggests otherwise.
People talk a lot of shit. The overwhelming majority will be grumpy if their borders change, but have no interest in bleeding over it.