A woman who previously dated Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner said he drunkenly forced her to have sex after she told him to stop, according to a Politico report released Monday, leading prominent supporters to pull their endorsements and throwing a must-win race for the party into turmoil.

Platner denied the allegation, but said he would be considering next steps for his campaign.

“Regardless of the inaccuracy of the reporting but mindful of the political reality it will inflict, we’re taking the time to reflect on the best path forward,” he said in a video released on social media.

Jenny Racicot, who lives in Maine, told Politico that Platner entered her home in 2021 while drunk and assaulted her. Racicot said she had been in an on-and-off relationship with Platner, but she cut off contact with him after that night and told him the incident wasn’t consensual. A voicemail left at a number listed for Racicot seeking comment did not receive an immediate response.

Platner’s campaign did not immediately respond to an email and phone message from The Associated Press seeking comment.

“Any accusation of non-consensual behavior is categorically false,” Platner said in his video.

Still, the allegation sparked a flight away from a candidate who has long been controversial. Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat who’d stood by Platner even as the insurgent candidate was hit with prior allegations, said Monday’s was enough. “I’ve been very clear that sexual assault or violence against women is a red line,” Khanna said. “These allegations are very serious and credible. Graham Platner should drop out from the race. I am withdrawing my endorsement.”

Edit: holy shit, these comments are insane.

Regardless of what you believe with this, Platner likely cannot win anymore. He has a week to do the right thing and drop out before he’s fully locked in. If he actually gives any sort of a shit (and doesn’t just want power, like rapists seeking office tend to), he needs to drop out yesterday.

This is the nail in the coffin for his campaign. It’s not time to defend him no matter what, because there’s still a week where a new candidate can be put into place. Instead of being mad at people not wanting to vote for him, you should start vocally supporting another candidate.

  • testfactor
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    Okay, calling me a liar is strong. I was going off the Wikipedia page for her political positions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Susan_Collins

    This is what I was referring to with the 70%:

    According to CQ Roll Call, Collins sided with President Obama’s position 75.9% of the time in 2013, one of only two Republicans to vote with him more than 70% of the time.

    And:

    During the Biden presidency, as of February 2022, FiveThirtyEight found that she has voted with Biden’s positions approximately 75.6% of the time.

    A further review does show her voting close to 95% with the Trump presidency: https://votehub.com/trump-score

    I do think “Trump Score” is a misleading statistic, in that not all votes are created equal, so knowing which votes someone defected on is almost if not more important than the number of votes. Look at Fetterman. He has a 40% voting rate with the Trump administration, but to hear it here he’s basically a Republican with a blue tie.

    All that to say, Susan Collins has historically been very moderate, and has had reasonable and nuanced takes on important issues.

    Planter has almost certainly raped multiple women.

    Would I rather a solid Democrat over Susan Collins? Absolutely. But character matters. And that’s true for anybody of either party.

    And painting Susan Collins as a far right lunatic is disingenuous at best.

    • edible_funk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      You cherry picked numbers to misrepresent the truth though didn’t ya.

      • testfactor
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        No, I just hadn’t looked at her numbers since the Biden administration and was working from memory.

        • edible_funk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          You opened with a stat from the Obama administration. How was that in any way relevant?

          • testfactor
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            The stats were from both the Obama administration and the Biden administration. The Trump administration is not reflected on that Wikipedia page yet.

            The Biden administration was only two years ago. It’s not like it’s ancient history.

              • testfactor
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Sure. I don’t usually do edits, as I’ve already admitted to using older data deeper in the thread, but if it makes you feel better, that’s fine.

                Original statement has been edited with a basic summary of the additional, more recent data.