When I delete a comment on Lemmy, people can still see that there used to be a comment by me that I later deleted. What’s the reasoning for that?

Edit: changed “post” to “comment”.

  • Widdershins
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why can’t comments be fully deleted on Lemmy?

    When I delete a post on Lemmy, people can still see that there used to be a comment by me that I later deleted. What’s the reasoning for that?

    1 make post with question
    2 get answer
    3 delete question

    The people from step 2 are getting tired of answering the same question that could have been answered if the original question was still up. What part of crowdsourced answer screams private question?

    • 712@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah I totally get that. But what about comments I make on a thread that noone has replied to. Completely deleting those wouldn’t harm anyone.

      • TropicalDingdong
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Its a design choice that is central to how the infrastructure of the fediverse works.

        And I disagree with your second statement.

        • 712@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          What’s the harm if I post “test” under a post without comments and then delete this comment one second later, without anyone having engaged with it?

          • Widdershins
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            What’s the harm if you leave it up? I would rather see graffiti on a building than the sandblasted outline of where the graffiti was.

            • 712@discuss.tchncs.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yes, if I need to choose between the graffiti and the sandblasted outline of it, I’d also pick the graffiti. But if I could power wash the graffiti and make it non-conceivable, I’d prefer that.

          • TropicalDingdong
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I mean you are more than welcome to make that not the case. The git hub repo is right there. Fork it and make it your own.

          • velma@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It’s the principle of it. Start making exceptions for certain comments to be deleted then where is the line drawn? Easier to have it so nothing is ever truly deleted.

            • 712@discuss.tchncs.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Hmm, but why does a social media need to be an immutable storage? I feel like I’m missing something here.

              I know some people are against any form of censorship and yes, I see the problem with the question of who can decide what gets deleted when. I’m totally on board here. But is “nothing should ever be deleted” really the best approach?

              Genuine question: if someone doxes your address on Lemmy, wouldn’t you want to be able to get it deleted?

              • velma@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Genuine question: if someone doxes your address on Lemmy, wouldn’t you want to be able to get it deleted?

                The someone still has my address, right? Getting it off Lemmy doesn’t really do much.

                I think that people using the Fediverse generally want there to be more transparency and more control by the users and less in the hands of a few admins. We’ve all seen how Reddit took control over users info and comments over the years. There’s a push here to not let that happen.

                • 712@discuss.tchncs.deOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Well it would prevent others from getting to know your address, preventing harm. Transparency is good, but I’m just afraid that immutable transparency easily be exploited by ill-minded people.

                  There’s a similar debate in blockchain, where people have put CSAM into the Bitcoin blockchain where it will be forever stored.

                  I guess it’s the old debate of freedom vs security.

                  • velma@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    There are ways for admins to step in on that kind of rule breaking, I believe. And I hope that’s true in the case that any CSAM might appear on Lemmy.

                    Lol yeah, it really is a rehashing of freedom vs security, isn’t it?