Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear is directly asking Sen. Mitch McConnell, the state’s most powerful figure in Congress, to disclose more about his condition after three weeks of silence from the 84-year-old since he was hospitalized in Washington.

The letter released Wednesday from Beshear, a Democrat who is considered a potential presidential candidate in 2028, to the former Senate Republican leader says “Kentuckians have grown increasingly concerned about the current state of your health and well-being, and ability to hold office.”

McConnell, whose physical condition has visibly declined in recent years, was hospitalized June 14. He has not released a public statement, photos or videos since. Aides have disclosed nothing specific about his condition, other than to say last week that McConnell “continues to improve, and is working closely with his staff on Kentucky and Senate matters while the Senate is out of session.”

That lack of detail has fueled rampant speculation about his prognosis and whether he will return to the Senate when it reconvenes next week. The firestorm was enough that Republican Senate leaders on Tuesday made public statements saying they had talked to McConnell and that he was alert and discussing current events.

McConnell is retiring at the end of his term in January, and the campaign to elect his successor already is underway. Kentucky’s Senate succession law, which Republican legislators have twice changed during Beshear’s tenure, does not give the governor a role in picking a temporary successor should McConnell’s seat become vacant before his term ends.

Under the latest change in 2024, if the seat becomes vacant before Aug. 3, there would be a special election to pick a replacement, perhaps held concurrently with the general election in November. The special election winner could take office nearly immediately. The general election winner would be sworn in as part of the new Congress in January.

  • nickiwest
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Beshear is an attorney, and a pretty good one at that. I’m sure he knows exactly how the procedure is supposed to work. His style is to follow the appropriate procedure to the letter while continually communicating with the public in the interest of transparency.

    “Ruthless” is not a part of his public persona. He’s a two-term Democratic governor in a state with a Republican super-majority in the legislature. He has spent a lot of time cultivating his “faith and family values” reputation, which could help push him onto the national stage. He’s not going to squander that for a situation where he doesn’t even get a say in the replacement. (Because, again, Republican super-majority. They knew this was coming and couldn’t stand the idea that the governor would have the power to appoint McConnell’s successor.)

      • nickiwest
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yes, in the year 2026, I firmly believe that Andy Beshear is a life-long bureaucrat with a carefully cultivated public persona and no desire to rock the boat and shatter any possibility of a run for President.

        This is not a hot take.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        They expressed a belief about a Democrat going easy on Republicans to support his future aspirations. They’re not suggesting anyone is being particularly wholesome.

    • diablexical@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They knew this was coming and couldn’t stand the idea that the governor would have the power to appoint McConnell’s successor.

      I heard the limitation was against the state constitution? Imo he should call their bluff and appoint a replacement. What is the risk, a faux pas (according to those who already don’t support him) and some lawsuits with the upside being a senate seat and shining light on republican corruption?

      • nickiwest
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That’s an interesting angle. If that’s true, he probably wouldn’t have standing to challenge the law until the situation actually arose.

        I lived in Kentucky for more than a decade, but I don’t know anything about its constitution.