You switch between “rapist” and “person with a credible rape accusation” when it suits your argument. Biden had a credible SA accusation, did you vote for him?
Never said that they were. One requires proof and you using it interchangeably shows your dishonesty. If he’s found guilty of the accusation then sure, but until then its your personal speculation, which means squat.
I didn’t. I merely said you don’t care about evidence. If this allegation is true should be resolved in court and not in public opinion just because you don’t like someone. Its a bad look.
You switch between “rapist” and “person with a credible rape accusation” when it suits your argument. Biden had a credible SA accusation, did you vote for him?
That’s because they aren’t mutually exclusive terms.
Never said that they were. One requires proof and you using it interchangeably shows your dishonesty. If he’s found guilty of the accusation then sure, but until then its your personal speculation, which means squat.
When only 2% of rapists ever see the inside of a courtroom, I don’t care what you think about my opinion here.
Hey at least you admit you don’t care about evidence.
Keep defending the guy who willingly killed civilians, pissed on dead bodies, and raped women. It’s a good look.
I didn’t. I merely said you don’t care about evidence. If this allegation is true should be resolved in court and not in public opinion just because you don’t like someone. Its a bad look.