I disagree. I think what we would find is there’s a lot more “betweeners” than we expect but the outliers of the really good or really evil will stand out ever stronger in contrast.
the difference between now and then would be the really evil people could no longer hide behind their lies. if anything, lying would only make it more obvious.
moralistic integrity in comparison to social norms.
it’s basically a good vs evil bar.
Eh I feel like that metric as you’ve defined it would unfairly skew negatively because of the sexuality of a person and thus misrepresent someone.
I disagree. I think what we would find is there’s a lot more “betweeners” than we expect but the outliers of the really good or really evil will stand out ever stronger in contrast.
the difference between now and then would be the really evil people could no longer hide behind their lies. if anything, lying would only make it more obvious.
Who’s morality are we using as the yardstick?
society in general, this way it’s dynamic.