• teslasaur
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The shorthand of “libertarianism, but even more ludicrous” sums it up well.

      • teslasaur
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Oh, do enlighten me what part of the statement is untrue and start from there. Instead of going to name calling.

        Anarchism is absolutely part of libertarianism, so that is check one.

        Ludicrous, because of it’s inherent opposition to structure undermines the idea of a coherent framework of ideals in a society.

          • teslasaur
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I’ve read plenty of them, but please. Bring your own interpretation instead of being a little condescending brat.

              • teslasaur
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                Indeed I have, but please keep embarrassing yourself by not even countering and just going to name calling.

                I suggest reading “Debt” by David Graeber to get a better understanding of the economic effect in social structures. There are plenty of examples of historical societies that have attempted and failed at anarchy. Most of them fail when the people that do the work society needs, get used by those that do not work, eventually leading to violence. That violence goes in opposition of the social agreement, although not necessarily, as there is nothing inherent about anarchism that would hinder violence.

                • Jack@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  David Graeber was an anarchist, it is in the second line of his Wikipedia. Also he talks about it in bullshit jobs a bit.

                  You really are doing yourself no favors here, go read some books.

                • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  I have read Debt, as well as Dawn of Everything plus Bullshit Jobs, also by the late prominent anarchist political activist and cultural anthropologist, David Graeber. The irony that you didn’t understand that those books are in support of Anarchism. You clearly didn’t understand anything about what you read.

                  Keep embarrassing yourself. You’re doing great at it.

                  • teslasaur
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 hours ago

                    From that book I understood that anarchism is not going to work. From the words of an anarchist.