This again, isn’t the first time I’ve mentioned this ; given the severity of the activity, and the evidence I’ve provided, why hasn’t there been any action

  • MeowerMisfit817
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    The flag button exists. But the site is moderated by an AI that is… pretty bad at its function. It flags “Child S––(you know what)” but not “CSAM”.

    • matesineedhelpOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      OK. I’m aware of this How is this going to solve the risk of future distribution, and how is it going to actually get the bad actors to actual authorities

      • Bomb Magess
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        get the bad actors to actual authorities

        It is impossible to report anonymous users to the authorities. Anonymity is a feature of Perchance. Users have to practice self responsibility in the generators they use and the chat.

        “No User Accounts: Many anonymous sites eliminate data collection and user tracking. Without centralized databases of user emails, login histories, or IP logs, it is much harder for authorities or corporate entities to legally demand user information or build cases against the platform itself.” - Gemini AI

        https://quantumitinnovation.com/blog/perchance-ai-character-generator-guide

        • matesineedhelpOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Even if the developer doesn’t actively build a database of emails, the underlying server infrastructure inherently handles IP addresses, connection logs, and device fingerprints. Federal law enforcement agencies like the FBI and NCMEC do not need a username and password to track a criminal; they use subpoenas to demand raw server and CDN traffic logs.

          - No website is truly “logless” unless the developer went out of their way to build a completely custom, untraceable server stack; which standard web hosts LITERALLY do not allow

          Under federal laws like the FOSTA-SESTA legislation and strict federal criminal statutes, a platform cannot use “willful blindness” as a legal shield. If a developer builds a public chatroom, is formally notified that federal crimes are occurring on it, and responds with, “Well, I designed it so I don’t track anyone, so I guess I can’t help you,” a court will view that as a deliberate choice to facilitate illegal acts