I agree with the rough sentiment but this author might have one of the most condescending written tones I’ve ever read. Truly, truly doing nothing for the cause.
But if you haven’t left [Trump] yet, you are either a total moron who shouldn’t be voting,
Yes, because testing for intelligence to vote worked out for everyone in the past.
Yes, because testing for intelligence to vote worked out for everyone in the past.
Just because it was done badly in the past doesn’t mean it’s fundamentally a bad idea.
If administrated well and fairly, I think it could actually make a democracy function so much better. The problem is trying to implement it well and fairly when the people in charge of doing the implementation are already the incompetent and corrupt result of flawed democracy.
I agree with the rough sentiment but this author might have one of the most condescending written tones I’ve ever read. Truly, truly doing nothing for the cause.
Yes, because testing for intelligence to vote worked out for everyone in the past.
Just because it was done badly in the past doesn’t mean it’s fundamentally a bad idea.
If administrated well and fairly, I think it could actually make a democracy function so much better. The problem is trying to implement it well and fairly when the people in charge of doing the implementation are already the incompetent and corrupt result of flawed democracy.
No we’re not doing this. Consider what else poor education levels correlate with.