• eickerOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Funny how »open is dangerous« only became the dominant narrative once Chinese models caught up: If your competitive moat depends on governments blocking free alternatives instead of building better products, maybe your moat isn’t technology at all.

    • realityisascammer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This is so blatantly obvious, for anyone paying attencion, that just goes to show how ignorant/naive most people are

      • eickerOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Ever since facts have been replaced by ideologies, the obvious has increasingly become a mystery.

    • zwerg@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t about your business, but we’ve had LOT of conversations about how much we trust these models. Not just about data egress, but on what they are trained to do/not to do - Chinese or not.

      • eickerOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Absolutely. Trust isn’t binary, and it isn’t unique to Chinese models either. Every (frontier) model reflects the incentives, values and constraints of whoever built it. That’s exactly why competition matters.