• 9point6
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    FWIW, 16:9 is mostly used for wide-screen TV content (about 1.85:1), the effect is more pronounced because cinema screens are typically 2.39:1 with most content being that ratio

    That’s why you still get letterboxes watching films on TV a lot of the time, despite us all having widescreens now

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      So when they release Odyssey for home viewing on streaming or however it gets released, do they pillar box it? Or they pan and scan edit it?

      • 9point6
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Home releases will almost certainly get the non-IMAX, 2.39:1 crop they’ve already cut for standard cinemas, and it’ll get the standard cinema letterboxing you see for other theatrical releases if you watch on a 16:9 TV.

        Pan and scan has thankfully died off as a practice

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I guess I should have said crop rather than pan and scan. But I assume it’s still not a “fixed” crop in that they might change the crop area based on scene or shot?

          • 9point6
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I guess it’s likely they’re doing some amount of that, yeah. However I believe the way directors typically approach IMAX is to still centre the shot the way you would without the extra vertical frame, so a centred crop would usually be the best option.

            I’d find it hard to believe that they never take the opportunity to shift things a bit if it would make it better anyway