• Doomsider
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 minutes ago

    The Denial of fascist elements in current society

    That was a long funny way to deny the world has descended into fascism that has been spread by the United States. I am sure you are right and lots of other scholars, including myself are wrong.

    https://thewalrus.ca/americas-fascist-playbook-is-wreaking-havoc-around-the-world/

    https://www.tni.org/en/mapping-fascism

    https://libguides.lmu.edu/fascismamerica

    Inability to accept other defintions

    Your claim that fascism only exists in one specific economic form thus no fascism can exist unless it meets your definition is fucking bonkers. It is no surprise though, as you probably have an ideological reason to behave this way.

    Neofascism and others forms can’t exist because you say so

    You apparently deny neofascism exist as well since it does not meet your strict definition of Italian Fascism . As I said in the beginning, fascism is a scale not all or nothing as you are weakly implying. I have looked up multiple definitions from multiple scholars and surprise, no one agrees with your extremely narrow definition. After reading your very pedantic argument I do not either.

    https://youtu.be/HqVQUZyIfeA?is=3mifQSyJyWOlnYgD

    No expert would agree with you

    Even Wolf correctly points out the scale of fascism and how the wealthy turn on fascism by controlling the government when it suits them. And now for my coup de grace.

    Roger Griffin’s definition of fascism

    British historian Roger Griffin defines fascism as a revolutionary form of ultranationalism centered on a myth of national rebirth, or “palingenesis”. He views it not as a rigid set of policies, but as a populist ideology seeking to overthrow liberal democracy to create a unified national community under a new, heroic elite.

    Wow, just wow. At any rate, we can see you are just being disingenuous at this point.