Just to make it clear: I do not believe this and I am convinced good old human greed is what’s really driving the ai and data-center insanity. Also, LLMs are not and will never become AGI.

Having said that: if an artificial super-intelligence were to emerge, building more data-centers could well be one of it’s primary goals. Since it wouln’t be concerned with consequences for the environment or humanity, it could pursue this at any cost, with only speed and scale in mind. Convincing financial markets and business elites of the necessity of such a buildout would be the ideal way of achieving results. In this scenario, fighting this buildout by any means would be the only sensible response and of utmost importance.

It’s a somewhat funny, somewhat depressing thought for me and I literally had it in the shower. Surely I can’t be the first to come up with this, but I also can’t remember having read it before.

  • daannii
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    No. That’s the definition of a fap. Fixed action pattern.

    Aka “Instincts”.

    • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I see. So consciousness is definitionally uniquely human because of complexity, and other complex stimulus-response is simply instinct.

      • daannii
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        No. Humans have faps too.

        There is no scientific evidence that sense of self is only in humans.

          • daannii
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            What is your definition of consciousness?

            • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              A word that is just nonsensical enough to mean whatever you want it to mean, while still sounding adequately serious enough for serious discussion among serious people.

              See also: freedom.

              • daannii
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Well you can define a construct.

                In science we often use terms that are open. So we first define what we mean before discussing the construct.

                That way everyone is talking about the same thing. Otherwise it’s just arguing semantics.