• Attacker94
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      We’re still at least a couple of years out from that, the biggest issue at present is app compatibility, specifically in the context of banking apps. For everything else it is usable with some minor quirks

      • friend_of_satan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Most banking (and many other) apps could be a website, and most (all?) banks have websites, so a linux phone could be compatible with most banks the same way a desktop OS is compatible with most banks.

        But I agree that we’re several years out from Linux phones becoming anything more than a novelty. It’s still a good path to take. We really need a magic rectangle that is not locked down in any way.

        • Attacker94
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I think the biggest issue is the 2fa for transactions which is annoyingly inconsistent between allowing SMS verification and requiring an app 2fa. I know that I have had fairly consistent issues with capital one in this respect, I don’t know if it is prevalent elsewhere

          • friend_of_satan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Are you saying there are banking sites where you have problems logging in using a web browser? Because using a web browser is what I am suggesting.

            • OozingPositron@feddit.cl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              My bank requires a proprietary 2FA app for any transfers between accounts or internet transactions in local websites.