• @s38b35M5
    link
    English
    481 year ago

    100% agree, but they charge for eyeballs, not clicks.

      • nicktron
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        Not most. Just enough to make it worth the money they spend.

        • @thedrivingcrooner
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          “just enough to justify not paying their workers livable wages” FTFY

      • @aceshigh
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Depends on the age demographic and lifestyle. For example, I pretty much buy the same things for the last 20 years. I’m not going to change my shopping patterns because of an ad.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Also, YouTube ads are about the most random things. I don’t think I’ve ever seen an ad on YouTube for anything that I would actually buy. I’m not even nearly immune to ads, either. Show me a product that solves a problem for me and I’ll strongly consider it. Consciously and I’m sure subconsciously.

          Google knows what I do for a living, where I live, and what I spend money on. Google also knows that I use YouTube primarily to watch videos in other languages. It’s not a secret to them. Yet they insist on trying to sell me products or services that have zero relevance to anything that I do. In English.

          It makes me wonder if they’re even trying to profit through ads. I know the answer – no, not really – the advertiser is the customer, not me. It must be too complicated for them to realise that they could charge more for ads the more sales they led to.

    • @AProfessional
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Clicks are the core part of how ads work… Cost-per-Click, Click-Through-Rate, etc.